Friday, March 20, 2009

Oh, the rewards of being a teacher...

A fourth grader just saw me walking out of the teacher's lounge while eating a donut.

"Mr Lesire!  I want a donut!  Can I have one?  CanIcanIcanIcanI?"

"Would you like to earn a donut?" I asked, in my most excited teacherly voice.

"Yes!" she replied.

"Alright, there are just a few easy steps.  Would you like to know what they are?"

"YES!"

"Okay!  Step one: finish high school!  Next, go to college for four years, and earn a teaching degree!  Then, land a teaching job, and you too can have a donut EVERY Friday!"

"Mr. Lesire, that seems like a lot of work, just for a donut."

"Hmm, you're right...  I may just have to spend some time rethinking my chosen profession."

The true reward, of course, was the chance to carry on a spirited, if somewhat sardonic, conversation with this student.  In truth, these kinds of exchanges are the ones I remember most as a student.  Quite frankly, they are a large part of why I chose to become a teacher.

Monday, March 16, 2009

More on the stratification of knowledge

Neil Liss has raised some interesting questions on my last post, and I will try to address them here. 

1. How stratified is knowledge and how educated is the general society as of now?

Well, the obvious answers can be found with a quick Google search of "education statistics".   There, you will find links that point you to sites that say 99% of Americans are literate.  That would seem to imply that a broad base of educated Americans exist.  Anecdotal reports would suggest that the higher one is on the socio-economic scale, the higher the level of education.  I'm sure statistics exist that could back up that claim...I simply haven't the time (or an impending doctoral thesis)  to compel me to find them at the moment.

I recently read about the "Matthew Effect", alluding to the concept in Matthew 25:29, "...the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer."  In some ways, I see the same thing happening in the general education of the populace.  Suffice to say, I feel that knowledge is somewhat stratified at the moment, and the real danger is the continuation of this trend.

2. What is lost when knowledge becomes too cheap?

My simple answer:






Really, though, I think a great deal would be lost if knowledge became cheap.  That depends entirely on your definition of cheap knowledge.  In my opinion, People Magazine is cheap.  The latest plot twists in "Kath and Kim" are cheap.  And the latest scores of the Beavers or Ducks are cheap.  They are easily accessible to even those of limited education, and they do have some entertainment value.  Do they serve an escapist purpose?  Of course they do, and they have their place as such.  

On the other hand, long lasting, worthwhile knowledge shouldn't become cheap.  That's why classic literature is sometimes described as those books you wish you had read, but don't actually want to read.  All things of value come with some struggle, and this is particularly true of knowledge, and more importantly, wisdom.

At the same time, I must say that while the pursuit should be difficult, the opportunity for such pursuits should be widely and readily available.  I think that is one of the most important accomplishments of the explosion of communication and information flow that is made possible by the internet revolution.  Yes, there is a LOT of crap out there.  But there is also a lot of solid, reliable information, and it is readily available to the masses, should they choose to seek it.  In my view, one of the teacher's most important jobs is to inspire them to try.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Will knowledge become stratified?

And will education in the digital age widen the gap between the have's and the have not's?  While much has been written about the impending demise of print editions of newspapers--usually by the reporters and editors who work for said newspapers--it will have an interesting effect on the daily education of society in general.  An interesting, if brief, take on the subject can be found here.

Still, I can't help but think of what Mark Twain said: "If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed.  If you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed."  All the more reason to stress critical thinking skills as a way to sift through the mass of information created about any single subject.

So much for the cushy job...

The times, they are a changin'.  Still, while big changes are coming to education and it will most likely make teachers' jobs more difficult, it will probably be of a huge benfit to students.  And that's why we teach, no?  Read much more here.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Twitter

Admittedly, I am a geek.  Still, I can't fathom the inanity of Twitter.  Neither can some of it's participants, as documented here and here.  Of course, John Stewart has put it best:


Everything You Need to Know


Everything you need to know has finally been conveniently boiled down into a single volume.  Read a review here.  Unfortunately, when you know "everything," you will still only know 0.000001% of anything.

What Would Google Do?

I heard a fascinating interview last night with Jeff Jarvis, author of What Would Google Do?  He makes the strong case that businesses (and by extension, educational institutions) who continue to use a Web 1.0 model, or worse yet, a pre-internet model will ultimately fail and be replaced by stronger, more adaptable competitors.  To wit, he looks at the way Google has become the fastest growing business in the history of the world:
  • Do what you do best and link to the rest
  • Make mistakes well
  • Free is a business model
  • Don't be evil
These principles, among others, can be used by teachers as they look to provide the best education possible for their students.